View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12 Jun 2003, 12:55 am
Steve03GT Steve03GT is offline
Regular Cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Renaissance Festival, TX.
Posts: 174
Send a message via AIM to Steve03GT
Default A Few Thoughts On The Mopar Issue

First, the "off-road use only" issue; I suspect D-C upper management, wanting to grab some market share away from Subaru WRX, Mitsu Evo, Ford Focus SVT, etc., fast-tracked this project to sell primarily SRT-4's, and as an afterthought the GT Cruiser, by offering up the MOPAR power adders. This created the emissions issue, again I suspect, by being ready for sale to the public before D-C got EPA and CARB certifications, both of which are expensive and lengthy.

Second, the warranty issue, especially for the Auto-Stick, may have raised engineering questions as to whether the auto tranny can withstand the additional torque over a prolonged period without a failure, be it clutches or other rotating parts.

The potential problem for the SRT-4 would most likely be the clutch.

Depending on what service factor was used in the development of the stock drivetrains, a reliability issue may be at the heart of this issue and is being given a second look by engineering before D-C sells the MOPAR packages without voiding the 7/70 or extended warranties.
My .02
Reply With Quote