View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 22 May 2006, 12:43 pm
fritz_t_coyote fritz_t_coyote is offline
Fanatic Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: new york, ny.
Posts: 584
Default

robinjoe: click on Hooligans name... note his past profession.

gas tanks are not designed to explode. They rupture too easily and merely dump out burning gasoline, which is not a day at the beach, but is not KABOOM.

As for cars powered by LNG .... those cylinders scare me.

And Dont Get Me Started on Hydrogen Cars. (Can you say "Hindenberg"?)

(Hooligan: Back in the 70s I was on a CD/Aux PD team and had just enough first responder training to keep from making things worse. My incident scene contribution was usually limited to directing traffic.)

Quote:
quote:Originally posted by robinjoe

Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Hooligan

Fritz, it sounds as if you have had Fire Fighters training. The tires on a vehicle are more dangerous exploding than the gas tank.
Doesn't it depend on how empty the tank is? My understanding is that a near-empty tank is more likely to explode because of the fumes, which are explosive (whereas the gasoline will just burn).

I would think that a bomb's explosion would be more likely to introduce a spark to the gas-air mixture within the tank than a normal crash.
__________________
I just tell anyone who asks that "PT" stands for "Plymouth's Tombstone"

www.visualizecommonsense.com
Reply With Quote