View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05 May 2008, 07:56 pm
quicksilverdon quicksilverdon is offline
Veteran Cruiser
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Phillipsburg, NJ, USA.
Posts: 4,356
Default Re: ceramic vs. semi-metallic brake pads

Quote:
Originally Posted by pppt03turbo View Post
thanks for everyone's replies. i decided to go with semi-metallic (the type of pads that came with the car).

actually, i had to do the front brakes twice, because the raybestos pads came with new aluminum channels. these are what each end of pads ride on. after installing everything, the test ride yielded massive sqeaking. i turned around and popped the wheel off. turns out, the new channels were not as wide (by a 1/4+"!) as the stock ones. so, i cleaned up the old ones and swapped them out. no more sqeaking. i don't know if this was packing mistake by raybestos or if they did not consider that gt's have larger brake calipers.

anyway, if you buy front raybestos pads, make sure the aluminum channel ends are wide enough. otherwise, you will be doing your brake job twice.
Those are stainless steel shims...
The GT has bigger rotors, and they always send shims for the standard disks.
I cleaned and re-used the original shims, too.
__________________
\'05 Limited Turbo Lite, (Silver, of course)4-wheel ABS, Sunroof, Spoiler, E&G Classic grill, K&N FIPK, BTG duals, rear lowered 1.5\", LED washer lights, $20 catch can, Aoogah horn, Weatherflectors, Sunroof Deflector, Fuzzy Dice, rear logo flames, rear pinstripe graphic, Gen3 Taillights, rear sway bar, hood struts, Strut bar.
Traded in \'02 Silver Touring Edition w/87,000 miles
Reply With Quote