View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 27 May 2003, 11:47 am
Steve03GT Steve03GT is offline
Regular Cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Renaissance Festival, TX.
Posts: 174
Send a message via AIM to Steve03GT
Default

Quote:
quote:Originally posted by mich_132003

Quote:
quote:Mich and dgc333- NO FLAMES INTENDED, BUT, if you're not interested in this subject, that's fine; however, may I suggest you ignore it and stop wasting bandwidth. Obviously there are members who do want the rear sway bar, as stated in Chrysler's original articles and window sticker, and this forum allows us to proceed as one voice.[^]
Steve - When you say things like "wasting bandwidth" is a concern of yours and you see a class action lawsuit against DC as productive, then I suggest you go right ahead, spend your time and energy on a process that will be a waist of time, energy, and money - except of course - for the lawyers. I'm all for principles but I guarantee you will get no where with this.
P.S. I'm am very concerned about issues and if you don't mind, I will continue speaking on this forum regardless of your "bandwidth concerns", if that's OK with you.
Oh ye of little faith. When the Dakota forum first advanced the prospect of suing D-M, there were a few nay-sayers, like yourself then too. In hindsight, I'm glad we didn't listen to them.
BTW, by "guaranteeing", you're assuring me and others that we can't persuade D-C to do the right thing by mentioning the potential of a lawsuit; on what basis may I ask?
__________________
\'03 GT Cruiser,White w/ Auto Stick, MOPAR Stg. I, AirAid intake,Alpine XM radio w/ 4 MBQuartz, Autometer Lunar Boost and A/F Gauges

\'02 Corvette (510 RWHP/510 TQ)
Member of 11sec. club &
NRA Benefactor Member
Reply With Quote