View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26 Jun 2003, 06:17 pm
Steve03GT Steve03GT is offline
Regular Cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Renaissance Festival, TX.
Posts: 174
Send a message via AIM to Steve03GT
Default

Quote:
quote:Originally posted by DTs_PTGT

Steve03GT,

Would the difference between Chrysler and GM actually be closer to (44.2 - 39.3)($62.78) = 307.62 if you're accounting only for the difference in labor? To me, your calculation ( 1.125(16448) ) adds in the cost of parts as well.

This is assuming that the parts for the car cost exactly the same amount.

IMHO, the real savings would probably be the net effect of more cars / plant / time cycle or the same amount of cars taking a shorter time to build.
Good point, but yes, I ASSumed parts costs to be similar since the article stated labor is ~15% (12-17%) of the cost of a vehicle. Does that make sense?; I'm very [:I] at this moment. I'll look at it later - afterall, I could be wrong.
__________________
\'03 GT Cruiser,White w/ Auto Stick, MOPAR Stg. I, AirAid intake,Alpine XM radio w/ 4 MBQuartz, Autometer Lunar Boost and A/F Gauges

\'02 Corvette (510 RWHP/510 TQ)
Member of 11sec. club &
NRA Benefactor Member
Reply With Quote