The two things we are dealing with here is WHAT & WHY:
WHAT: Maybe Hot Rod magazine can do another teardown like they recently did. Seeing hardware published would certainly help calm the confusion. Another choice might be
www.bstockum.com [:I]
WHY: We'll never really know, but I suspect marketing.
As I implied previously, I think the 180 is going to be viewed as an economical choice rather than the _______________ choice.
I think what Kirby is saying is that there is a general trend in society today to shy away from understanding a product's
content. Here's an example: Stainless appliances. It's not stainless; it's only stainless "clad". It's all about simplistic initial impressions. Mom always said: "Don't be so superficial." OK Mom.
Fuzzy logic is really getting a grip. Q: Why do Ford transmissions blow after 60,000? A: Because that's as long as they last(!??!) Whaaaaa?[xx(] Is this acceptable logic?
An automoblie is a complicated POS to own. It is better to ask questions containing technical merit or as to why the PT has gone unchanged (except Turbo) for the past
four years! It has only been re-clad. I digress...
Anyway, I'm going to keep open mind for people who want to critique this car and be more guarded for those who critique the critiquer. [8)]