![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Site Home | Forum Home | Photo Gallery | PT Events | PT Videos | Car Videos | Parts Search |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Thanks for all the feedback so far! I agree I like them too on big sUVs I just wanted to know everyones take on the subject, Did you know that Lexani has placed real jewels on rims diamonds and gold and emeralds and what not, I even saw a set advertised recently for diamond studded wheel locks how crazy is this world we live in 200k a set last I heard. But thanks for the support.[:X]
|
|
|||
|
it depends on the car, big sedansd and suv's look crazy good when they are spining. Not just bolt on spinners either, gotta be true Dub with a solid black wheel that a chrome spinner bolts onto. Looks mad clean. My buddy has an 04 lincoln aviator with 22" DUB spinners all black background and crome 5 spoke spinner looks amazing.
Dan
__________________
<font color=\"blue\">Patriot Blue</font id=\"blue\"> 02 5-Spd |
|
|||
|
IM NOT IN TO SPINNERS, BUT ON SUV'S THERE COOL ON 22'S +
__________________
![]() \"You All Laugh Because I\'M Different, I Laugh Because YOU\'RE All The Same!\" |
|
|||
|
I think It would make the PT look like a toy car.[8D] Just say no to spiners.
|
|
|||
|
I kinda thought they were old news really. Would look silly on a PT, too.
|
|
|||
|
Instead of spinners. Look into the rims that DONT spin. The center stays stationary as you drive down the road. They IMHO look lots better, not to mention, you cant get your finger chopped off when trying to clean them.
|
|
|||
|
Yeah I ve seen the cubic rims...$250,000 a set LOL
__________________
I love my PT!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|||
|
Sorry when I say cubic I sent the fake diamond LOL[:X]
__________________
I love my PT!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|||
|
Thats ok I just order a set of 18" Chrome American Racing Casinos from AlexAlex they'll be on in a couple of weeks. Go ALexAlex! Your One Time Limited Time PT Cruiser Parts Stop Store! Trying saying that 10 times fast. Don't be shy she's got alot for eveyone just hurry sale end soon check the classifides for more.[?][:X]
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
But in my opinion, spinners belong on SUVs(AWD) and RWD cars. They dont belong on FWD cars, they dont work right. I've seen fwd cars with them and when they stop, only the front wheels spin but not the rears and if they do, not very long. This is because the front wheels pull and the front disc brakes stop the spinners which make them turn but theres no driving(pulling)of the rear wheels or when you come to a stop the rear brakes dont work as hard as the front ones cause the the rear spinners to hardly turn. On RWD or AWD vehicles they work the best and spin the longest. And If you go the spinner route, since you have a fwd car, make sure the spinners dont poke out from the rim. Make sure you have a deep enough lip on the rim and they sit flush within the rim. Spinners that poke out ruin the whole effect to me of them.[|)]
__________________
2002 PT Cruiser Touring Edit.(Stone White)(148.2 DB) --Rear match Tinted front windows, 20\"+18\" Limited 800 rims+ Toyo proxes 4 tires;\'20\"\'Chrome DUB badges to clarify, 6000k Polarion HID kit, silverstar foglight bulbs, Carriage Works polished Billet grille, Mopar Chrome fuel door, APC Euro tails + clear reverse lenses+ strobes, headlight strobes, Streetglow G.S UB kit, Ps2,2 Clarion 5.8\" headrest monitors, navigation system, 2 12\" Infinity subs with 1000 Watt Kenwood Amp/custom box., and a Shorty antenna + Chrome base. ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Took the 'Cruiser for a spin this weekend | patbluecruiser | General PT Cruiser Discussions | 8 | 03 Mar 2005 01:53 am |
| The No Spin Zone | CREWZIN | Non-PT Discussions | 4 | 03 Feb 2005 10:55 am |
| Test Spin | Mel K | Turbo Performance | 6 | 17 Jan 2004 05:35 pm |