![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Site Home | Forum Home | Photo Gallery | PT Events | PT Videos | Car Videos |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hate to disagree with you, Steelblue,(if I've interpreted your post correctly) but I have never gotten better gas mileage from Regular Unleaded than Premium in any car I've ever driven in my 27 years of driving experience. Premium fuel burns quicker because of the higher octane, therefore, you use less fuel to burn per piston. Lesser octane fuel means you need more fuel to get it to ignite and move the piston. I agree though that you can use the proper octane for what your car calls for, but in my experience, the higher the octane, the better the fuel economy. How much better depends on how your engine is tuned.
__________________
2002 Inferno Red PT LE (Auto), Blane Hood Struts, 3rd Brake Light sign - SERENITY AirAid Intake, Chrome Taillight covers - more to follow |
|
|||
|
Premium fuel used to be called "Ethyl", because of the addition of tetraethyl lead (spelling?) to slow the burning rate and prevent uncontrolled combustion under high compression conditions. As I recall, the 10,000RPM Chev drag racers of the 60's used regular gas, because premium wouldn't burn fast enough at those engine speeds to produce the power they were after.
As has been said, lower grade gas for our pride and joy is a false economy, unless the only alternative is to get out and push.
__________________
BTgotGT |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
PTurbed |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Well, PTurbed, I have to disagree with the comment about no 60's Chevy turning 10,000 RPM. I ran a drag car with a balanced and blueprinted (and lots of other stuff) 327 that we shifted at 10,000 and ran that engine that way for over a year and it NEVER self destructed. Had lots of friends running small block Chevy's running 9,000+ all day long.
Mike |
|
|||
|
And that is where the power comes from not the gas itself! Trust me you want to use the corrrect octane that DC has engineered to optimize power and ecconomy. Again using premium on an 87 octane designed engine will not do anything but make the oil companies richer. I do that on my 87 mustang cause I also advance the timing from 10 degrees to 14 degrees and I pick up a few almost free ponies.
Quote:
__________________
06 GT Auto, Cool Vanila Exterior, Presto Change O 3bl, Cargo Mat and Net, Billet Oil Cap, Yoko Avid 4Vs Tires, 03 GT Wheels, 4 Chrome Door Handle Screw Covers, MOPAR Mud Flaps, H&R Rear Sway Bar, Freedom Strut Tower Bar, Rear Door Sill Covers. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Some details about your 327 please? What years, what class, heads, cam, springs, rods, gear ratio, times were you running?? Drag racing in those days certainly wasn't as sophisticated as it is today!! [8)]
__________________
PTurbed |
|
|||
|
Use 91 gas, if your going to nerf a turbo cruiser, just buy the N/A [:0]
|
|
|||
|
Ok, so the back of my car says 2.4L Turbo GT High Output
There is no sticker in the fuel door; I 'think' the manual says to use 87 octane. The car doesn't seem particularly fast... Have I ruined this car by using 87 octane?
__________________
\'05 GT Conv.; 2.4L H/O Turbo; auto/autostick |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Try some good stuff & i'm sure your car will be quicker. [8)]PS Welcome to the forum. Let us know how you make out. [^]
__________________
PTurbed |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Error Codes | thegoldpt | Turbo Performance | 6 | 07 Apr 2007 02:26 pm |
| Error Codes | skylight | Tech & Performance Forum | 6 | 07 Apr 2007 02:19 pm |
| Error Code List | skylight | General Turbo Discussions | 6 | 07 Apr 2007 02:11 pm |
| Checking interest in new fuel mod for turbo PT | MarksPtGt | Turbo Performance | 11 | 02 Jul 2006 08:18 pm |
| All 2002 Cruisers Recalled??? | zzzhuh | General PT Cruiser Discussions | 18 | 24 Mar 2004 05:12 pm |