PT Cruiser Forum Car Videos
Jeep Parts | Car Rims      

Go Back   PT Cruiser Forum > General Forums > Non-PT Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Site Home Forum Home Photo Gallery PT Events PT Videos Car Videos  

PT Cruiser Forum

Figure this One Out

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 22 Jul 2005, 09:49 pm
King_Rob King_Rob is offline
Fresh Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brandon, Manitoba, Canada.
Posts: 17
Default Figure this One Out

At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, AAFS
President, Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story:

On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit suicide.
He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency. As he fell past the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window, which killed him instantly.
Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he had planned.
"Ordinarily," Dr Mills continued, "Someone who sets out to commit
suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide." That Mr. Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have been successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.
In the room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were
arguing vigorously and he was threatening her with a shotgun. The man was so upset that when he pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and The pellets went through the window striking Mr. Opus.
When one intends to kill subject "A" but kills subject "B" in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject "B." When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were both adamant and both said that They thought the shotgun was not loaded.
The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, assuming the gun had been accidentally loaded.
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident. It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother. Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.
Now comes the exquisite twist. Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten-story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window. The son had actually murdered himself so the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.

A true story from Associated Press, Reported by Kurt Westervelt Mark C. Anderson Director, Materials Handling Room 101A, Park Avenue Warehouse
Bowling Green State University Bowling Green, Ohio.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 22 Jul 2005, 11:42 pm
Espresso Espresso is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Panama City, Panama.
Posts: 315
Default

I remember reading this way back in 97. It is a good joke, but it is not true. Very thoughtful though. They even used it as a plot on Law & Order.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finally got on the Dyno...@@Dyno Scans@@ TripleJackInGA Turbo Performance 30 01 Jul 2004 12:14 pm
5 speed question lip General Turbo Discussions 37 23 Apr 2004 02:30 pm
All 2002 Cruisers Recalled??? zzzhuh General PT Cruiser Discussions 18 24 Mar 2004 05:12 pm
whats the new HP figure? Punch General Turbo Discussions 10 02 Sep 2003 02:28 am
Can't figure it out! Engine "miss" in all gears garlin Tech & Performance Forum 2 19 Jul 2003 11:58 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 am.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 © 2007, Crawlability, Inc.
vB.Sponsors

  Consolidation Loan | Worms For Fishing Bait UK | Cheap Flights | Cheap Flights | Mortgages