Quote:
quote:Originally posted by nehope
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Retro
I read the same thing. She was divorced from the kid's Dad and he and the child's stepmom raised him was what I read, with very little interest from Cindy. I am a Mom and respect the loss of anyone's child, but I think it is abominable if this woman paid little attention to her child when he was alive and now is using his death to promote her agenda. Her family has definitely spoken out and said they do not agree with her and her second husband is also divorcing her. Many of her statements are outrageous.
|
Where did you read/see this? Because I did a search and didn't come up with anything like this.
It's best to leave this one alone. This is a no-win situation. Let her have this. I know I couldn't/wouldn't presume to tell a parent how to grieve.
|
I'm not telling a parent how to grieve, and I am sorry for anyone losing a child regardless of the circumstances. But I do disagree with someone "using" the death to promote a political agenda. That being said, this is what I dug up from snopes about this issue specifically, and according to snopes, the piece they quote, which is what I read, is wrong:
"Cindy Sheehan
Claim: Cindy Sheehan's son, Casey, was raised by her ex-husband after the couple divorced and both remarried.
Status: False.
Example: [Collected on the Internet, 2005]
Another view of Cindy Sheehan
What is most interesting is that the press gives this little bunch of people who are protesting with Cindy so much air time without discussing Cindy's background. This is a case of more press bias.
It has been pointed out on just a couple of media outlets that Cindy divorced her first husband and left her son with him to be raised while she became a political activist for the Democrat Party. She had very little to do with her son in his growing years.
She remarried. The 1st husband remarried. The original father raised the son with his new wife. They miss their son and mourn the loss of his life. They have stated that they are very proud of their son and that they agree with the stance of America in Iraq and on terror. They said that their son was eager to serve and to go fight the terrorists in Iraq. He volunteered. How many news stations carried their interview? Not many.
So the son dies in Iraq and then Cindy shows up to make a stink. She gets an audience with Bush. That was not enough. She goes to Crawford and demands another audience. How many news stations carry the ongoing saga of Cindy? Practically all of them. Cindy didn't care about her son. She let another woman raise him. Cindy doesn't care about the other soldiers in Iraq. Cindy cares about her liberal, feminist agenda and about using the death of her son to lobby against Republicans and Bush. And the press is helping her. Why?
Then a few days ago, Cindy's 2nd husband filed for a divorce from Cindy. Cindy sounds like a feminist opportunist who did not have the sense of responsibility to even raise her own son. It looks like her 2nd husband is fed up with Cindy. We Middle Americans should be fed up with Cindy also. We should be fed up with the press. They manipulate us into their "group think" and into the responses that they want on their polls.
Origins: Casey Austin Sheehan, a 24-year-old U.S. Army Specialist from California who served as a mechanic with the First Cavalry Division out of Fort Hood, Texas, was killed in an ambush near Sadr City, Iraq, on 4 April 2004. Since Casey's death, his mother, Cindy Sheehan, has become an outspoken critic of U.S. military involvement in I