Hoping for US Casualties

[satellite66]

All of you antiwar Bush bashers must be swelling with pride with what your poster girl is up to. Again imagine if all this effort was put into actually supporting the troops and their efforts.

HOPING FOR U.S. CASUALTIES

The anti-war left has finally let it slip...they've shown their true colors about what their agenda is, and if you didn't read between the lines, you might miss it. Here goes. The Crawford Crackpot Cindy Sheehan, along with other Bush-bashing protest groups are gearing up for the 2,000th American Military casualty in Iraq. The only problem?

They're a little short. As of yesterday, the death toll stands at 1,996. Cindy Sheehan says she plans to tie herself to the White House fence and refuse to leave until the troops are brought home. But for Crazy Cindy to activate her plans, she needs 4 more troops to die. And thus the entire agenda of the anti-war movement is exposed: their political agenda is only served by U.S. Military casualties and setbacks. Good news in Iraq is bad news for them. They are an extension of the Blame-America-First crowd.

Nowhere in the media statements of Cindy Sheehan does she say that she hopes there won't be a 2000th casualty. If that doesn't happen, she's out of a job. And of course, it's all about her. So what happens if no more troops die? That wouldn't be good for Cindy. She needs 4 more lives to be lost to achieve her next big round of media attention.

These groups claim to be worried about the welfare of troops serving in Iraq. But yet they just can't wait for that 2000th soldier to die...they'd probably speed the process up if they could.


Link

[Espresso]

Man, would you just shut the hell up already. If they Bush bashers actually cared don't you think they would have posted it by now? Do you actually search for **** to post to try & stir up ****. It sure seems so. You never seem to post anythign GOOD about Bush you only post bas **** & say "all you bashers must be happy". If you are such Pro-Bush, why not post GOOD stuff about him? Can you find any?
I hope you have fun argueing between the 3 of you over on the political forum. There is a reason people stopped/ don't post there. WE DO NOT CARE!!

NO ONE GIVES A ****. Give it a rest alreay. Damn.

[satellite66]

I did not realize that you were the arbitor of what should be posted? I realize that stiffling any comment that does not meet with your political agenda is your goal but if you don't like what I post don't read them. For someone who complains about "arguing" you seem to enjoy doing it. You have had no problem when anti Bush stuff is posted.

[Hill Cruiser]

Satellite66, is your real name Dick Cheney?

With the conservatives in control of all branches of government I'd think you'd stop all the complaining. The world is exactly the way you're role models have made it. Can't blame anything on the liberals, they're powerless, have no agenda and no leader.

If your still unhappy with the course of world events hang on, things may be changing. With the Republican leadership under indictment or about to be, policies may change. George has got to run out of friends to appoint sooner or later and then he'll be left with nothing but qualified candidates.

[Espresso]

I have no "political agenda" as you woudl love to think.
I don't give a ****.
Normally anyone that is "PRO" anything. Posts things that they are for. NOT what the "ANTI" are for. THAT IS ALL YOU POST. You are a joke.
You always post crap like this & try to stir things, it's stupid, liek most of the points you try to make.
You always throw around "lefty" & righty" bull****...NO ONE CARES.

All you do is complain. You post **** like this, then try & get as you put it "Bush-Bashers" riled up & when they throw questions at you to awnser. All you come up with is "reality , blah, balh, blah". You are ALWAYS on the defensive, never offensive. And you post crap that puts you there. Are you retarded or just looking to look like an idiot? Either way you are doing a fine job.


Why not post something you are in support of? Why not try & make "Bush-bashers" look bad by posting something positive? Is it because you can't?

[satellite66]

Hill, I'm not unhappy with the current party in office. It sure seems you, Expresso and Cindy Sheehan are though. Liberals and their allies in the press are undermining and obstructing in every way they can. They are doing this to get back into power. They have learned from the past elections that the lack of ideas and leadership on the left can't win at the ballot box so they have chosen obstruction and of late they are also trying to criminalize conservatism.

[Hill Cruiser]

You shouldn't assume that anyone's liberal because they don't like your constant BS attacks. Or maybe you think that anyone who disagrees with your blind-with-bias attacks is a liberal. Could that be because conservatives like you have their opinions issued to them and they are not allowed to change them. Thinking for yourself and changing your mind as the facts change is called "waffeling" isn't it?

This will scorch your shorts...in 1992, John Ashcroft,at that time the Governer of Missouri, authorized state funds be used to transport female inmates to abortion clinics.

I'll bet you have nightmare's tonight!

[satellite66]

What does Ashcroft doing in 1992 have to do with anything? If that was the law then what should he have done?
My posts are attacks but what others post are okay?
Why would I want to change my opinions if I believe they are right?

[thegoldpt]

Uhh, what happend to my POLITICAL forum? On mine you can leave out the stars......

BTW... Cindy Sheehan is an idiot, even the far left knows that.....

[satellite66]

goldpt your forum is great. I wanted to share this as a way of presenting a veiw that some may not get. I judge by the response that others here don't like having ideas they disagree with posted.