![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Site Home | Forum Home | Photo Gallery | PT Events | PT Videos | Car Videos | Parts Search |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
It seems odd to me how the powers that be at Chrysler decided not to offer the diesel version to us here in the U.S. With Toyota bragging on their Prius hybrid for 2010 maybe being able to get 50 mpg, the diesel PT (from articles I've read) was there or close to it for quite a while. 40 to 45 mpg, a bit more kick in the power dept. and everything else we like about the PT, sheesh what's not to like? Maybe if they would have listened to the people who buy their cars they 1:wouldn't be in the financial shape they are in now and 2:we would still have the PTcruiser. I guess this is a bit of a rant,sorry but I just hate a pencil pushing suit sitting behind a desk try to tell me what I like. Like I said, sorry bout this but I feel better having said it.
|
|
||||
|
all of the above are true however nothing stopped the Dodge Trucks they pretty much set the standard on diesels and really they are just a 6 banger
(its funny the always compare Chevy and ford to the Cummings they are big bad v8's going up and losing agins a 6 cyl--got ta love it) Me I cant see any reason that the PT is not offered in a diesel the VW TDI is a awesome power plant great millage and tons of get up and go You go find a VW bug wiht a diesel and it will be $100's higher than a non diesel The Pt would have been a great car to try some thing in and the really sad part is they already had them in production Guess it was not ment to be |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diesels | superpug666 | Non-PT Discussions | 12 | 02 Mar 2009 08:55 pm |