![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Site Home | Forum Home | Photo Gallery | PT Events | PT Videos | Car Videos | Parts Search |
|
| View Poll Results: Can you tell your performance is better with the selected brand? | |||
| AirAid Intake for NA- yes |
|
4 | 80.00% |
| AirAid intake for NA- No |
|
0 | 0% |
| Fuel Inj. Ram Air Turbo/Non Turbo - K&N- YES |
|
1 | 20.00% |
| Fuel Inj. Ram Air Turbo/Non Turbo - K&N- NO |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
With either you'll definitely get batter MPG than you're posting. You'll also hear that intake, not as much as a turbo but it does improve the sound, in my book. You'll pay about 35% more for the K&N, and I think the Airaid systems seem to me to fit somewhat better. But then it's sort of a coin toss. They both make very nice looking kits. My take is the K&N has a better filter, but the Airaid has a better setup, so go figure... if it were me, and I had an NA car, I'd go with the Airaid... but I've never tried one out so maybe others with experience with them can post their feedback. Either way, even if you just get a drop-in for your current intake, you're going to get some gains from it.
Now I've read what the adverts say, "Up to 12 hp gain". BS.. and I was tempted to spell out the whole word...lol... I ran my car, stock, on a dyno here in NC, then installed Crane Firewires, gutted my stock intake and put in a drop-in. No other performance mods. Here my car ran right at 185whp, 205lb ft torque on the factory setup. Almost exactly what Chrysler says the car will do, as it's rated 230 hp at the crank. The calculated whp from 230hp, is 184whp, so damn if I wasn't close. Then took the car to Florida and ran it on the dyno at RageTek. Mind you, big differences are seen between dynos, add to it much denser air in Florida versus where I was here in NC, so you always take your dyno readings with a 10% factor, that's it can be +/- 5% either way. Put in tha K&N and the fire wires, ran it on their dyno, first run was 212whp, 225lb ft torque! Do the math, 27hp gain, 20 lb ft gain in torque. Uh, that's almost too much for what I'd done, but had fresh oil, fresh plugs, fresh wires, fresh air filter, 3" intake from fender to turbo, and ran about 2 quarts of race fuel to richen up my mixture a bit, and boost the overall octane to somewhere around 95 or 96. All that added up to that 27hp gain. Mind you, we went ahead and did a custom tune that really blew that away, but this whole story is to show that just cleaning it up a bit, adding fresh oil, plugs and a high-flow filter really do work some magic on your horse power. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
\'05 Stone White SRT4 \'04 Graphite PT Automatic |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Nemo did a custom tune for my DSP with my S2 and bolt ons. The srt-4 flies.
__________________
\'05 Stone White SRT4 \'04 Graphite PT Automatic |
|
|||
|
Did any of this help anyone? I am looking at doing the same thing but unsure if there is really a difference between the k&n or the airaid besides the looks and price. I know some people see a difference and some don't, but has anyone seen a difference using the k&n drop in and modifying the air box? i know I' ve read a few things on this site and others but no real consensus. I am guessing that its just personal preference but it a good bit of dough to dish out.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cabin air filter | AlmondTurbo | General PT Cruiser Discussions | 36 | 07 Sep 2011 07:58 am |
| OIL FILTER SANDWICH | GALVANIZEDYANKEE | General Turbo Discussions | 5 | 11 Sep 2009 01:31 pm |
| airbox foam breather filter, DIY replacement | ptandme | General PT Cruiser Discussions | 2 | 14 Oct 2008 11:34 pm |
| K&N filter oil on BTG filter? | Punch | Turbo Performance | 1 | 15 Oct 2003 11:55 pm |