![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Site Home | Forum Home | Photo Gallery | PT Events | PT Videos | Car Videos | Parts Search |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Before they do anything I'd have whichever mechanic take a look at the wiring for both the CAM and CRANKshaft sensors. Lots of problems with wires harnesses rubbing and cutting into the wires.
A signs of a timing belt about to go is that it will stretch and cause the timing to go off. You didn't say what you mileage is but you said "normal mileage for an 05" so I'm guessing 60,000. You shouldn't need a timing belt at that mileage be it stick shift or automatic. The belt hasn't broken (you wouldn't go anywhere) and unless you've been to the drag strip lately, the chances are there's no internal damage. The tensioner was changed in 2003 so you already have the newer one. As long as the mechanic gets one for your engine, it will be alright.
__________________
![]() ...just CREWZIN along! ® . . . PT Cruiser Links Moderator ![]() 2000 PT. Original Owner, 110,000 miles MY technical suggestions are given in GOOD FAITH without total guarantee, if in doubt go to a Garage. Visit My Home Page www.CREWZIN.com |
|
||||
|
Dealer sounds scary...
78,000 is early for a timing belt - but I guess not impossible. $400 - $450 for a timing belt is a real bargain, and yes, be sure you get new tensioner, but I'm not sure you need it done yet. The P0344 is camshaft sensor intermittent - could VERY well be wiring - have that looked at before you pay for timing belt that may not cure it.
__________________
'05 Limited Turbo Lite, (Silver, of course)4-wheel ABS, Sunroof, Spoiler. Mods: E&G Classic grill, K&N FIPK, BTG duals, rear lowered 1.5", LED washer lights, $20 catch can, Aoogah horn, Weatherflectors, Sunroof Deflector, Fuzzy Dice, rear logo flames, rear pinstripe graphic, Gen3 Taillights, rear sway bar, hood struts, Strut bar. Traded in '02 Silver Touring Edition w/87,000 miles |
|
||||
|
Cruz - it's at 78,000. A little high for an 05, but not astronomical, IMO. When I got her in March she already had 70,980 (and the lady at Chrysler corp asked why I didn't renew the warranty - uh, cause you sent it to me way late AND it had already expired, so ask the 1st owner).
To address both of you guys, I guess I should have mentioned I did ask the first mechanic if he checked the wires and he said yes. I'll have my guy check again just to be sure. Thanks for the reassurance about not warping her. I logically know that, but with the luck I've been having and the laundry list Chrysler presented (they wanted to also give me a new oil pan - mine's not leaking, so I have no idea why other than more $$$). Haha, when he told me $4-450, I told him if we hadn't been on the phone, I would have kissed him! :* |
|
||||
|
Hmm, just talked to my guy - said the belt seems to have enough tension and timing looks okay on top. Wires look okay, too. Cracking her open to look... The only other thing I can think of is the dealer said maybe it was the actual cam? Can anyone give me ideas about that? Is it expensive? If it is, should I just go ahead and have the timing/water done while it's open?
Ugh, I hate this guessing game!
|
|
||||
|
Talk to your mechanic - he's got to take belt off to get head off, so a lot of labor would be duplicated to do belt later.
Depends on how many miles you put on car & how long you intend to keep it - belt is typically good to 100,000 miles. I would guess a valve problem, not cam. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
hmmm... these engines aren't variable valve timing are they?
I find it odd that it runs fine up to 3k but acts up at higher rpm's. If these engines are VVT then it could be related to cam timing above 3k - which would explain the error codes. Or could it be vacuum related? (not sure why the cam sensor error code would log though if it were vaccum related which brings us back to potential sensor/sensor wiring failure, but why does it run fine up to 3k?) Or is the PCM not advancing spark at higher rpm's? Spark not hot enough? If it was a valve, a compression check/leak down test should confirm before tearing into the head. If it was bad enough there might even be a slight 'tick' from the leakage in the compression chamber. Might try a stethoscope or the old screwdriver trick touching the area of the cam covers near each valve with the other end of the screwdriver against your noggin'. LOL While a cam lobe could have been damaged that seems unlikely unless the engine has been pushed hard. What about a failing cam follower that can't keep up at higher rpm's? ![]() If I remember correctly, a backfire could cause a cam sprocket skip. Like from detonation when starting the engine. Wonder how the teeth on the belt look. Ignoring the cam sensor code, could it be fuel related whereby the engine is starved for fuel above 3k? Any change in the quality of fuel being used? (way out in left field... my chain saw just started the same problem kind of LOL... would start fine but give it throttle and it bogs and dies. It was a vacuum leak in the fuel line...) Thinking out loud from the days before data logging.
__________________
Charliehorse 2010 Classic in Deepwater Blue w/Grey Interior 2008 Bullitt Mustang #901 Last edited by cdynaco; 13 Nov 2009 at 02:35 pm. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 100% Right-100% of The Time | BLUEH20 | General PT Cruiser Discussions | 7 | 07 Jan 2009 02:39 pm |
| 2nd time around... | StoneWhitePT2 | Exterior Accessories Forum | 2 | 24 Jun 2008 12:37 am |
| New best time | nuke72 | General Turbo Discussions | 3 | 10 Nov 2007 09:24 am |
| How Much Time? | turbomangt | Non-PT Discussions | 15 | 03 Jan 2004 12:42 am |
| When its go time | RODRUN | Turbo Performance | 5 | 13 Sep 2003 05:41 pm |