PT Cruiser Forum Car Videos
Jeep Parts | Car Rims      

Go Back   PT Cruiser Forum > 2.4L Turbo Forums > Turbo Performance
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Site Home Forum Home Photo Gallery PT Events PT Videos Car Videos  

PT Cruiser Forum

Bypass the cat?

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 31 Mar 2008, 02:18 pm
Mean Green Mean Green is offline
Dedicated Cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon.
Posts: 2,170
Default Re: Bypass the cat?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cleverklutz View Post
To an extent if you remove restriction from the intake, the head, or the exhaust you'll pick up "free horsepower." An engine is often compared to a big air pump, make the air go in, through, and out easier, you'll improve efficiency.

I previously had a 1993 Dodge Dynasty with a 3.3L engine. I put in a test pipe, removed the muffler, and ran a 2 1/4" diesel resonator. I gained a second in my 0-60 time. My brother has a 1994 New Yorker. His trip computer showed he gained 2 mpg when he pulled the cats out of the exhaust.

I'm thinking there are gains to be had on my car pulling the cat. Keep in mind mine is N/A tho. I'll check into the bylaws here, and if it's all good I'll try it.

Ben
Keeping in mind the na is only 150 hp that weighs 3200 lbs removing the cat for a test pipe will likely gain you a whopping 1-3 hp that you'll never feel. It's also been said that the stock cat flows pretty well on the na and the exhaust system is all mandrel bent so it flows well for a na car. I went through all that adding an intake, header and an exhaust system on my '01 PT. Though it felt faster to me when I put it back to stock it was just as slow. But, building up a car is fun and as long as you don't expect big things out of the na PT then it should be all good. When I started modding my '03 PT GT that car took well to new performance mods. Got it up to 280 hp and that little car was fun to drive. Enjoy.
__________________
\'05 Stone White SRT4

\'04 Graphite PT Automatic
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 22 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
05CruisergtHO 05CruisergtHO is offline
Fresh Cruiser
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
Default Re: Bypass the cat?

My previous car was a 2002 dodge neon 5spd with an aem intake, energy motor mount inserts, ported TB, ported intake manifold and a MPX underdrive pulley. Finaly I added an OBX ceramic coated header/test pipe. The sucker was loud and anoyying on the highway. I did see better gas mileage and more performance. But personaly, I would just go with a high flow magnaflow cat or even a catcocat ( I hear they are the best ) with a turboback exhaust.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
map sensor bypass JaviPTGT General Turbo Discussions 4 17 Oct 2007 08:02 am
what does the mopar BOV PLATE sound like-does it bypass the purge valve completly ? mino Turbo Performance 1 15 Oct 2007 02:21 pm
F/S 3" AEM Cold Air Intake Bypass Valve AZ_IceMan Classifieds: For Sale/Trade 0 08 Aug 2005 06:06 am
Blow Off Valve Conversion Kit gonzomania Tech & Performance Forum 10 08 Sep 2004 09:08 am
How lucky was I? (BOV install) alceryes General Turbo Discussions 27 18 Jul 2004 11:29 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 am.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 © 2007, Crawlability, Inc.
vB.Sponsors

  Agencia de viagens | Homeowner Loans | Credit Card | Flights | Mortgages