![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Site Home | Forum Home | Photo Gallery | PT Events | PT Videos | Car Videos | Parts Search |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you have a boost/vac gauge you can keep it on the vac side and not use the turbo at all. The turbo model has more torque than the na model so the turbo model takes off easier and you can use less gas if you keep your foot out of it. For myself if I stay out of boost for the whole tankful I can get 5 more mpg. I've done this before, but it isn't as easy to do as you think because of the fun factor of getting on the car.
__________________
\'05 Stone White SRT4 \'04 Graphite PT Automatic |
|
||||
|
So, I just had my first OTR trip, about 55 miles each way. I have a few questions for you ol' pros out there.
I have the '08 2.4T. At 65, I stayed at 2500 rpm, 24.9 mpg At 70, I kicked up to 2700 rpm, 22.5 mpg. Big difference for only 200 rpm! As I understand, it kicks in at 2500 rpm. But surely it doesn't run when I am simply cruising down the flat highway at moderate speeds . . . that seems to defy the physics of turbocharging. Last edited by vtmdsm27; 15 Sep 2008 at 08:52 pm. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
you can make a small amount of boost under 2500 but it wont make full boost untill over 2500. you can cruise down the highway at 3k+ and still not use the turbo. it all depends on you foot if you stay on the vac side you'll see better fuel mileage on our last road trip we avaraged 25mpg and we were cruising between 70-80 we went 240mi and use only 9.5 gal of fuel if you have a gauge and stay on the vac side you can get good mileage.
__________________
![]() Nevin. 03 SRT-4 68 Mustang Coupe 05 GT Cruiser H.O. — last dyno 245hp/283tq @ 15psi — OCT 08 3 in intake, Stage 1 PCM, Stage 2 WGA, ported turbo, 682cc, 160 deg T-stat, Check valve, Ngk 4306 plugs, 10mm spark plug wires, 3in O2, 3in DP, 3in Y-pipe with E-cutout, 2.5 in catback exhaust, upper/lower hardpipes, HKS SSQ bov, block off plate, Energy Suspention MM inserts, hawk hps front/rear pads, Drilled/slotted rotors, steel braded front lines, Mopar 26mm Swaybar, energy suspention swaybar bushing, energy suspention swaybar endlinks, APC Non-turbo strut bar, Black housing headlights, Tinted rear tail lights, Schroth 4 point harness, Perrin catchcan, 3 pod a-piller, boost guage 30/30, oil pressure gauge, volt gauge |
|
|||
|
no man, a turbo and a supercharger both do the same thing, the force more air into the engin makeing a bigger explosion and burning more gas, so it will not make it better on gas, but you dont buy a turbo to get fuel efficancy
|
|
|||
|
hey nevin the srt looks really nice !!
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
and no they work differently a supercharger is belt driven and runs on the engines power a turbocharger runs on exhaust and creates it own atmosphere. the better you get air flowing to it, the more efficent it will work, the less fuel and air will be needed to make a good amount of power (thats if your not beating the crap out of it) it is possible to get better fuel efficienty out of a turbo car. when i got my SRT-4 it was getting 23-25mpg highway now that i modded it, it now get 35mpg highway. So i got an increase of 10 mpg now do that with a supercharger. our Cruiser was getting 19mpg when we got it in May with the mods so far its now getting 25mpg and were not even done modding it yet.
__________________
![]() Nevin. 03 SRT-4 68 Mustang Coupe 05 GT Cruiser H.O. — last dyno 245hp/283tq @ 15psi — OCT 08 3 in intake, Stage 1 PCM, Stage 2 WGA, ported turbo, 682cc, 160 deg T-stat, Check valve, Ngk 4306 plugs, 10mm spark plug wires, 3in O2, 3in DP, 3in Y-pipe with E-cutout, 2.5 in catback exhaust, upper/lower hardpipes, HKS SSQ bov, block off plate, Energy Suspention MM inserts, hawk hps front/rear pads, Drilled/slotted rotors, steel braded front lines, Mopar 26mm Swaybar, energy suspention swaybar bushing, energy suspention swaybar endlinks, APC Non-turbo strut bar, Black housing headlights, Tinted rear tail lights, Schroth 4 point harness, Perrin catchcan, 3 pod a-piller, boost guage 30/30, oil pressure gauge, volt gauge |
|
||||
|
__________________
![]() Nevin. 03 SRT-4 68 Mustang Coupe 05 GT Cruiser H.O. — last dyno 245hp/283tq @ 15psi — OCT 08 3 in intake, Stage 1 PCM, Stage 2 WGA, ported turbo, 682cc, 160 deg T-stat, Check valve, Ngk 4306 plugs, 10mm spark plug wires, 3in O2, 3in DP, 3in Y-pipe with E-cutout, 2.5 in catback exhaust, upper/lower hardpipes, HKS SSQ bov, block off plate, Energy Suspention MM inserts, hawk hps front/rear pads, Drilled/slotted rotors, steel braded front lines, Mopar 26mm Swaybar, energy suspention swaybar bushing, energy suspention swaybar endlinks, APC Non-turbo strut bar, Black housing headlights, Tinted rear tail lights, Schroth 4 point harness, Perrin catchcan, 3 pod a-piller, boost guage 30/30, oil pressure gauge, volt gauge |
|
|||
|
The PT has a very small turbo which spins up quick so you get full boost at a low RPM. I could be wrong but I think I remember reading when they first came out that full boost was available at 2200 RPM. However, full boost does not mean peak torque or horsepower. Like any other engine, it has a power curve. That is where you will really feel the turbo push you into the seat. On mine it starts about 3000 RPM and keeps going from there.
The turbo's spin speed is directly related to the amount of exhaust gases passing over the blades, so the turbo spins all the time that the engine runs, it just doesn't spin fast enough under low acceleration to create boost. Boost is directly related to how hard you push the go pedal
__________________
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turbo Replacement Question | PTCruzzn | General Turbo Discussions | 7 | 06 Jul 2009 07:14 pm |
| Blow Off Valve Conversion Kit | gonzomania | Tech & Performance Forum | 10 | 08 Sep 2004 09:08 am |
| Turbo leaking oil | 03baggedturbo | Turbo Performance | 5 | 09 Dec 2003 09:54 pm |
| 2003 PT Turbo Review by AUTOTEST FILE | Gary04GT | General Turbo Discussions | 2 | 12 Jul 2003 09:14 am |
| Chrysler to Offer New Cheaper GT Turbo | skylight | PT Cruiser News and Rumors | 19 | 12 Jun 2003 02:04 pm |