![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Site Home | Forum Home | Photo Gallery | PT Events | PT Videos | Car Videos | Parts Search |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Ok, I searched the site and didn't find what I was looking for, so I will ask. I have read that the SRT-4 can go from 0-60 in 5.8 seconds, so why is the PTGT rated at 7.2? [:I] The difference in weight is 250 lbs, so that's approx .25 seconds. If I remove the back seats and the spare tire, I am about 100lbs away from the SRT-4 weight. That being said, in theory, i should be able to run a GT from 0-60 (manual tranny) in just under 6 seconds.
So what else is different? What am I missing? the SRT-4 has 5 more HP, but not enough to make a 1 second difference. Thanks. |
|
|||
|
I think the PTGT will do it in under 7 seconds for a 0-60 mph run.
Not sure either why there is such a large difference... Cheers, LIP
__________________
2003 Electric Blue GT 5 speed loaded |
|
|||
|
Because the PT has the aerodynamics of a milk truck? [
]There are differences is the exhaust, intake and PCM programming between the two, in addition to weight.
__________________
![]() 2003 GT Inferno Red,5-spd,Eibach Springs,Koni Sport Adjustables, Eibach front and rear Sway Bars, Mopar Stage 1,Mopar BOV,Custom 2.5\" Dual Tip Exhaust (Magnaflow),Hurst Short Throw Shifter, Pioneer DEH6500 Headunit, RF Punch 300 and 301 Amps,RF 12\" Sub and MB Quart Reference and Premium Speakers,Ronal RT 17x7.5\'s with Michelin Pilot Sport 225/45ZR17s, Koni Adjustible shocks, Keystone single scoop, GT Airraid Intake, Mopar Ground Effects Homepage: http://www.cardomain.com/id/ptgtredman http://blueman.ptenthusiasts.net/index.html |
|
|||
|
I think the 7.2 second time you see was a test for the AUTO version of the GT, not the manual (obsiously, a setup not available in the SRT-4). Therefore, I am sure that you would get a sub-7 second 0-60 time for the GT 5-speed. Since the disparity between the two is very close at this point, I would think that perhaps transmission gearing or final drive ratios may be different (not sure, though). Also, I have some difficulty power shifting in my GT & the shifter is not the quickest tool for accelerating with. Maybe the SRT-4's is slicker.
Finally, with respect to aerodynamics, this will have almost ZERO affect on a 0-60 run, as there will not be significant wind resistance effect up to that speed. You will find aerodynamics to be a factor at higher speeds (say, 90-on). |
|
|||
|
Redman, I was thinking more along the lines of a phone-booth on wheels.
__________________
![]() ![]() \"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.\" Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 www.cybermopar.com TripleJack |
|
|||
|
The exhaust is probably why the srt is rated at 5HP higher than the GT.
I am not sure about the gear ratio's or shifter for that matter, but i do know most of the SRT guys change the stock one for a STS, for the same reason we want to on the GT (long and slow). |
|
|||
|
I agree, but that alone wouldn't account for the difference in 0-60 times.
__________________
![]() ![]() \"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.\" Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 www.cybermopar.com TripleJack |
|
|||
|
Just FYI:
SRT-4 T850 transmission 1st gear: 3.56 2nd gear: 2.05 3rd gear: 1.37 4th gear: 0.95 5th gear: 0.76 Reverse: 3.47 Final Drive: 3.53 Overall top gear: 3.20 PT GT Getrag transmission 1st gear: 3.92 2nd gear: 2.21 3rd gear: 1.46 4th gear: 1.11 5th gear: 0.88 Reverse: 3.62 Final Drive: 3.29 Overall Top Gear: 2.898 It should be noted that the Getrag was 1st used on the 2002 PT CRD (turbo diesel).
__________________
2002 Almond Pearl Limited Edition 27K It\'s nice to be important, but it\'s more important to be nice. http://sci-fi.ptenthusiasts.net/
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
PT GT - Fastest damn lease car I could hope to have... |
|
|||
|
it north of that. Try 600 lbs.
interesting.. but i will have to disagree, i think.. although i have seen conflicting info. The Neon is spec'd at 2600 lbs while i have seen reports of the SRT weighing approx 2900. That is where i got my number from.. is it correct, who the F knows..[xx(] |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2003 PT Cruiser Diagnostic Manual set | Dalite | Classifieds: For Sale/Trade | 1 | 21 Apr 2005 10:06 pm |
| 2003 chromed out GT for sale | bluebluegt | Classifieds: For Sale/Trade | 0 | 30 Jan 2005 09:37 pm |
| Texas WRX vs. PTGT results | Mihoshi | General Turbo Discussions | 5 | 14 Nov 2004 05:30 pm |
| New Incentives on 2003 and 2004 Models | skylight | PT Cruiser News and Rumors | 3 | 15 Oct 2003 12:26 pm |
| recal question | midnight03 | General Turbo Discussions | 17 | 27 Sep 2003 07:06 pm |