PT Cruiser Forum Car Videos
Car Rims      

Go Back   PT Cruiser Forum > 2.4L Turbo Forums > Turbo Wheels/Suspension/Handling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Site Home Forum Home Photo Gallery PT Events PT Videos Car Videos  

PT Cruiser Forum

Spring Rates

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 29 Oct 2004, 05:02 pm
eliminator eliminator is offline
Fresh Cruiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.
Posts: 37
Default Spring Rates


I've done a bit of research on springs to find out the spring rates for various kits.

-H&R sport (50800): 1.4"/1.3" lowering. According to the tech dept: "Rates increased 20-30% over stock." Which means nothing to me since I have no idea what the stock rates are, or if they mean stock base model, Touring, or GT.

-Gold Line (GPS-0300): 1.5"/2.0" lowering. F)160#. R) 160# variable rate. However, they didn't say what the beginning and ending rates are.

-Eibach Pro (2860.140): 1.6"/2.0" lowering. F)159# linear. R) 91-160# variable. According to Eibach, the rear spring is into the 160# rate at static ride height, so it basically functions as a 160# linear spring.

-Vogtland (950307): 1.4"/1.4" lowering. F) 168-230#. R) 138-285#

-Mopar stage 1: 1"/1" lowering. F) 200# linear. R) 185# linear

I crossed the H&R's off my wish list simply because they wouldn't tell me what the spring rates were. Gold Line and Eibach seem like a pretty soft rate for that much drop. Maybe that's why they work OK for some people with the stock shocks. I like the Vogtland's and Mopar stage 1's best because the rates are a bit higher, and they should be better able to keep the suspension off the bumpstops.

If anyone has more info, such as the stock spring rates, please post it.

-Steve
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 29 Oct 2004, 05:32 pm
Cal Cruzer Cal Cruzer is offline
Senior Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Huntington Beach, CA, USA.
Posts: 1,547
Default

Quote:
quote:Originally posted by eliminator


I've done a bit of research on springs to find out the spring rates for various kits.

-H&R sport (50800): 1.4"/1.3" lowering. According to the tech dept: "Rates increased 20-30% over stock." Which means nothing to me since I have no idea what the stock rates are, or if they mean stock base model, Touring, or GT.

-Gold Line (GPS-0300): 1.5"/2.0" lowering. F)160#. R) 160# variable rate. However, they didn't say what the beginning and ending rates are.

-Vogtland (950307): 1.4"/1.4" lowering. F) 168-230#. R) 138-285#

-Mopar stage 1: 1"/1" lowering. F) 200# constant. R) 185# constant

I crossed the H&R's off my wish list simply because they wouldn't tell me what the spring rates were. The Gold Lines seem like a pretty soft rate for that much drop. Maybe that's why they work OK for some people with the stock shocks. I like the Vogtland's and Mopar stage 1's best because the rates are a bit higher, and they should be better able to keep the suspension off the bumpstops.

If anyone has more info, such as the stock spring rates, please post it.

-Steve
FWIW I got a little more drop than that from my H&R's
__________________
'03 Inferno Red GT, 5 speed, STAGE 1, Mopar BOV, Plastic Intake, Modified Upper and Lower Airbox, Custom Airbox-to-turbo pipe, Borla dual exhaust, Maddog Short Shifter, Drilled/Slotter Rotors, Ceramic Pads, chrome wheels, chrome door spears, AMP chrome fuel door, PT Cruiser 3rd light diffuser, H&R Springs, Rear Sway Bar added, MGW chrome door lock pulls, Blane's hood struts, Custom license plate mount, some interior dress up stuff...more to come
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 29 Oct 2004, 06:12 pm
Sci-Fi Sci-Fi is offline
Fanatic Cruiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA.
Posts: 543
Default

The 2003 PT GT stock spring rates are:
Front: 160 ln/in
Rear: 140 lb/in
__________________
2002 Almond Pearl Limited Edition 27K
It\'s nice to be important, but it\'s more important to be nice.
http://sci-fi.ptenthusiasts.net/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 29 Oct 2004, 07:08 pm
JohnM JohnM is offline
Regular Cruiser
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas, TX.
Posts: 117
Default

Great info Eliminator - thanks.

I have the Mopar springs on order, and it's great to get learn how they compare. (back ordered) I plan to pair the springs up with Tokico HP shocks. I don't think I will need to trim the bump stops with that setup.

BTW - I'd highly recommend the stock rear anti sway bar.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 29 Oct 2004, 08:57 pm
Mike-in-Orange Mike-in-Orange is offline
Senior Cruiser
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orange, CA, USA.
Posts: 1,028
Default

Quote:
quote:eliminator Posted - 10/29/2004 : 4:02:17 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-Gold Line (GPS-0300): 1.5"/2.0" lowering. F)160#. R) 160# variable rate. However, they didn't say what the beginning and ending rates are.

-Eibach Pro (2860.140): 1.6"/2.0" lowering. F)159# linear. R) 91-160# variable. According to Eibach, the rear spring is into the 160# rate at static ride height, so it basically functions as a 160# linear spring.
I have a new hero!! Thanks, this explains a lot. As Sci-Fi posted, if the stock spring rates are 160F/140R that probably explains why I had the rear end bouncing problem I did with the GoldLines and stock shocks, yet the front seemed fine. I'll just bet that the GoldLines start at 160 and get firmer from there, thereby compounding the problem. Probably also explains why people who have installed the Eibach springs aren't as bothered by the problem. If the Eibach rears are a pretty linear 160 then they aren't that far beyond factory, so the factory shocks can handle the task better. I would imaging that the factory shocks may have a shorter life with these springs, but hey, we'll all replace our shocks sooner or later, right?

Thanks guys! This is great information!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stage 2 WGA vs spring mod. turbotouring Turbo Performance 9 01 Aug 2005 01:47 pm
Cruiser Quarterly Spring Issue fear1pt General PT Cruiser Discussions 40 14 Jul 2005 11:55 pm
Spring Meet Antique Auto Show Pictures RetroPT Northeast PT Forum 3 08 Jul 2004 11:47 pm
Spring popped out!!!!!!! turbomangt Turbo Wheels/Suspension/Handling 7 01 May 2004 06:02 pm
Second Annual Spring Rally postponed... GTCruzr Northeast PT Forum 0 06 Apr 2004 11:26 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 am.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 © 2007, Crawlability, Inc.
vB.Sponsors

  Debt Help | Mortgage Calculator | Car Insurance | Cheap Samsung LCD TV | Mortgages